Skip to main content

Replied to a post on github.com :

Ahh, no... that was a deliberate change that was made some time back.

I think this was done because having title link to the permalink, and the image to a different place, was confusing.

The original is still there, and is even exposed through the data-original-image attribute.

I could see an argument for linking to the original image if the photo is displayed in a permalink rather than a stream though...